Documents
Names, dates, registration and policy details that don’t match across RC, licence, policy and estimate.
Fraud & Red-Flag Intelligence
ClaimHorizon builds a structured evidence trail across documents, images, video, metadata, location, timestamps and claim narratives, then flags inconsistencies for review instead of relying on isolated observations.
Red flags are investigation signals, not proof of fraud.
Red-flag intelligence checks every piece of claim evidence against the others (documents, photos, video, metadata, location, timestamps and the claimant’s account) and raises a signal wherever they disagree. In ClaimHorizon, each signal goes to a human reviewer. A red flag is a reason to look closer, not proof of fraud.
Seven sources, plus your pre-inspection record
Single observations are easy to explain away. Inconsistencies between sources are what manual review tends to miss.
Names, dates, registration and policy details that don’t match across RC, licence, policy and estimate.
Damage that looks older than the reported loss, or the same photo appearing on more than one claim.
Gaps or cuts in a walkaround, or angles that avoid a panel.
Capture time or device details that don’t fit the reported date of loss.
Photos captured far from the reported accident site or garage.
Loss date close to policy start, or intimation timing that needs a second look.
Statements that don’t fit the recorded point and line of impact.
Claimed damage that was already recorded before the policy began.
Examples of the checks that can be configured. Each insurer decides which signals apply and how they are routed.
You are the reviewer
Pick a flag, compare the evidence, then decide. Dismiss it with a reason, request more information, or escalate it to investigation. Every decision is logged.
Illustrative sample claim. No real customer data.
Photos 4–7 were captured about 18 km from the reported accident site.
Photos may have been taken at the garage the next day. Ask the surveyor to confirm where the vehicle was inspected.
A front-bumper scratch on this claim was already recorded at pre-inspection.
Check whether the new damage goes beyond what was recorded before the policy began.
Statement says the vehicle was hit from behind; recorded point of impact is front-right.
May be a wording error in the statement. Request clarification before escalating.
How it works
Evidence from every source is checked against the others as it arrives.
Each flag shows the evidence on both sides and why it was raised.
Flags go to the right reviewer by type, severity and the insurer’s rules.
The reviewer compares evidence and can ask for more information.
Dismiss with a reason, or escalate to investigation. Every step is logged.
The connected advantage
Because pre-inspection, Spot Setu and claims share one evidence repository, a claim can be checked against what was recorded before the policy began and at the scene.
360° video, photo 3, QC-approved
Geotagged at the reported site
Garage estimate, line 1
Sent to the surveyor to check the new damage against the July record
Red flags are investigation signals, not proof of fraud. Final decisions remain with authorised professionals, subject to policy terms, professional review and applicable regulations. Genuine claims continue through the normal workflow.
FAQs
ClaimHorizon builds a structured evidence trail across documents, images, video, metadata, location, timestamps and the claim narrative, then checks them against each other. Where they don’t agree, for example a photo taken far from the reported accident site, a red flag is raised for a reviewer to look at.
No. A red flag is an investigation signal, not proof of fraud. Every flag is reviewed by a person, and final decisions remain subject to policy terms, professional review and applicable regulations.
Examples include mismatched dates or names across documents, damage that appears older than the reported loss, photo capture times or locations that don’t match the claim, reused images, gaps in a walkaround video, and statements that don’t fit the recorded point of impact.
When a vehicle was pre-inspected with ClaimHorizon, the condition recorded before the policy began can be compared with the damage claimed later. Damage that was already recorded is flagged for review instead of being paid as new.
Authorised reviewers, surveyors and investigators. They can dismiss a flag with a reason, request more information, or escalate to investigation. Every action is logged in the audit trail.
It is designed not to. Clean claims continue through the normal workflow, while only claims with inconsistencies are routed for extra review.